In order to help keep you informed and stimulate your thinking with regards to the current financial context, Stéfane Marion and Denis Girouard take a look at economic news and share their perspectives via our monthly informative videos.
Hello everyone, welcome to Economic Impact. It's September 2nd, 2025, and as usual, I am with our friend and Chief Economist Stéfane Marion. Hello Stéfane.
Hi Denis.
Well, it's been a while since the last meeting, but you know, things are pretty good on the stock market.
It's been a while, but it's been eventful and one thing that you know not too many people expected, myself included Denis is the great performance of global equity markets up 10% year to date. Every region of the world is delivering positive returns. Note Denis that the second-best performing index among the main regions is the Canadian one, up 15%. So, again, we weren't expecting this, but I have to say, Denis, people were saying there's going to be a tariff war. It hasn't been a tariff war. It's been unilateral U.S. protectionism because U.S. is imposing tariffs, but there's no retaliation or very limited retaliation from other parts of the world. So, it's not your textbook tariff war. Maybe that explains the perspective, you know this performance of the stock market saying well maybe the global supply chain is not entering tremendous uncertainty, which I'm not certain about.
Yeah, at the same time, when you're looking at the economic news, it's kind of disturbing because you look at the GDP in Canada and it's not that good.
OK, so based on current news, can you justify 15% for Canada? GDP is not doing so well. I know a lot of people are saying, well, it's proven to be resilient. GDP is just down 1.6%. Consumers are still spending, but gross domestic income, which looks at all the revenues generated in Canadian economy, that was down almost 3%. That's the worst we've seen since COVID. So obviously, Denis, if people have less money and corporations are generating less revenues at this point in time, you could probably say that this might lead to an underperforming economy yet in the second half this year. So, Q2, there's not much of a rebound in place, I think for the second half of the year at this point in time.
And at the same time, we see that the labour market is not that great now.
No so the GDI is the most correlated one with labour markets. So, less revenues in economy, generally speaking, that means corporations will invest less and they won't hire as much. So, diffusion unemployment right now, there's only 35% of corporations that are actually hiring, so below 50%. It's a figure we haven't seen outside periods where the economy is still in contraction. So again, great performance of the stock market, but it's mostly based on expectation as opposed to current news, which is not so good, but it does open the door for rate cuts by the Bank of Canada.
OK. But talking about expectation, you know, since the last time, Mr. Carney is doing a lot of announcements, you know, to promote and to give more money to the economy and the investing and a lot of sectors and it's quite unusual too.
Yeah, it's automatic about making Canada investable again because we've had no growth in business investment for the past 15 years. So, one thing, one of the big news, that’s been announced since we last met: deregulation. So, Mr. Carney is looking at this, looking also at valuing, putting more emphasis on natural resources, perhaps selling LNG to Germany, for example. But importantly, going forward for the stock market, the new commitment to spend up to 5% of GDP and defence spending, something we haven't seen since the Korean War, is a big deal Denis because it probably leads to a period of reindustrialization for the Canadian economy. So, in essence, that would mean that we transform our resources here in Canada and manufacture some of these resources. So, that might be why the stock market is performing so well as opposed, you know, to just, you know, current news.
And maybe Mr. Carney was listening to you, because way back then, you know, you showed us a slide where, you know, the Canada industrial base was one of the lowest from the country.
So, the message we've been conveying to the authorities is that you can't be the 7th largest economy in the world and you're having a manufacturing sector that's 18th in the world, which means you're not, you're basically exporting raw resources to the rest of the world and you're shrinking your manufacturing sector. So, this is why there's a made in Canada solution to reindustrialize Canada. And maybe we can leverage what we want to do on the military side to promote an increase in manufacturing. Our manufacturing sector is just too small. If we can get a system where we can get a procurement to Canadian industries to boost their defence spending, that could be good for the Canadian economy and sustain the valuation of the stock market.
And that's probably what the stock market is telling us right now.
There could be some of that.
Maybe.
Yeah.
OK, now we need to talk about tariffs because it's, you know, we're talking about that everyday almost. What's the impact of the tariffs?
So, again, it's not a tariff war. It's unilateral protectionism. There was a meeting between China, India, and Russia this weekend. They want to change the supply chain. At the end of the day, I understand that the Q2 earnings season was better than expected globally and in the U.S. Denis. But note that it's only in the second quarter, at the very end of the second quarter, June to be precise, that the U.S. started collecting tariffs on a significant scale and it's increasing now. And so, the impact, the true impact of tariff collection, it was more likely to be observed in the third quarter, in the fourth quarter of this year as opposed to the first half of this year where they were announced, but they weren't collected.
And for the inflation, you know, we're expecting inflation to rise its state quite at the same level, you know, 3% for a while.
So, there's a belief in the market there and there's been tariffs. There's been no impact on inflation. Well, it's only starting now Denis and the latest news on inflation suggests that, the July numbers suggest that, you know what, over the past three months, core inflation is running at 3%. The 12-month change is actually accelerating at this point in time. So, you're well above the target, you know, normally, the 2% target that, you know, the central banks are looking at. So, it's going to make it hard for the Fed to cut rates. They will be cutting rates in in the weeks ahead, but how much can they cut when inflation is accelerating?
Yeah. And at the same time, you know, we're seeing peak in long-term rates.
So, you're absolutely right. If the bank, if the central bank cuts rates and the long end of the curve becomes de-anchored because they're not sure about, you know, whether the Fed's going to be politicized and what type of, there's a lack of discipline in government spending right now. What is unusual, and you have to go back, way back Denis to see the last time that the Fed was reducing interest rates and yet the 30-year bond yield is moving higher. And that's a global phenomenal: lack of discipline at the fiscal level in many countries, but the U.S. running a deficit of 6%. This will be important to watch Denis. This will be a key driver for financial markets in the months ahead.
Then we can see a steepening of the yield curve.
Definitely a steepening under these circumstances. You're right.
OK, before the end, we need to talk about currency, especially the greenback.
So, you're talking about a potential steepening of the yield curve, maybe long-term rates moving higher at a time where 30% of the entire U.S. bond market is held by foreigners. Denis, if they're skeptical about your outlook about inflation, your commitment to keep inflation at 2%, you're going to shun the U.S. dollar. It's exactly what's happening right now. And U.S. dollar at a cyclical low. I think there’s scope for more downside, Denis, at the end of the day. So, that would mean, yeah, you know, the price of U.S. dollar alternatives be it gold alternative assets, even commodities, might be a lot more resilient because of this U.S. dollar depreciation. So, the point being Denis that we haven't seen the last of this tariff policy on the impact of financial markets. So, we've had no volatility or very little volatility this summer. I can't guarantee you the same for the next few weeks, next few months. So, let's be prudent. That's seasonally, that's not an easy season for financial markets or the stock market. The long end of the curve will be important to watch.
OK, Stéfane, our last meeting you were quite optimist. Are you still very optimist?
I'm, you know, from a Canadian perspective, I'm still optimistic in a sense that Ottawa has finally deployed policies that might be more structural in nature and good for the economy. But this type of stimulus won't come before 2026. So, I'm optimistic that we're going in the right, moving in the right direction, but doesn't mean there won't be any volatility in the weeks and months ahead. I need to tame the long end of the curve for global financial markets. And then Ottawa, I need to deliver on the fiscal plan and the budget won't come before later this fall.
Well, thank you, Stéfane, and thank you all of you who are listening to us. But above all, don't miss our next meeting early October. Thank you.
Hello, everyone. Welcome to Economic Impact. Today, it's June 11th, 2025 and as usual, I am with our Chief Economist, Stéfane Marion. Hello, Stéfane, a little bit different today, a lot of structural change and we want to talk about it.
Well, we hope to keep people interested, but you're absolutely right that we'll mix a bunch of stuff that's cyclical versus structural, which makes the story more interesting, I think. But let's start with the cyclical dynamics that we've seen, we're seeing in U.S. so, well, we've said many months ago that, maybe US corporations would start reacting negatively to the uncertainty created by the tariff structure in the U.S.. And what we've seen in the latest jobs report in the U.S. is that corporations are still hiring if you look at the redline Denis, but they're not hiring full time. So, they're not committing their capital full time, whether it's human capital or physical capital, not investing right now. So, it's not just Canadian corporations that are struggling to understand the new dynamics, but we're seeing it in the jobs report. So, this sets the stage for slower growth in the U.S. in the second half of this year.
This is what you call uncertainty for the future. And you don't want to have a full-time employee, you prefer to have a part-time employee that, if things are going bad, you know, it's easier to lay off people.
You don't want to commit until you actually understand what your business model will be like say the next six months or next year.
But the equity market is doing well, not new high, but despite of that, you know there's good news.
So, let's put things in perspective. You're right, not doing badly in recent weeks. It's a recovery, but U.S. stock market is one of the only ones that's not back to its previous highs. So, there's still this level of uncertainty created by, there's high valuation in the U.S., we're talking about structural adjustment to the supply chain. Companies are not committing capital right now. So, the U.S. market is coming back, don't get me wrong, but it's one of the few markets that's not back to an all-time high.
Yeah, but that performance is probably only linked because of U.S. investors. Because when you look at the greenback or the U.S. dollar, it's not doing well at all and keeps going down.
So, it's been driven by U.S. investors, the recovery, because foreign investors, you're absolutely right, they're still shunning U.S. assets, whether it's the U.S. bond market or U.S. equity markets. It's not that they're not buying, but they're not buying as aggressively. And that's clearly apparent on the exchange rate in the U.S., which is struggling this quarter. It's one of the largest depreciations in over five years, down 3.5%. So, it means central banks are less active in buying U.S. assets, but also private investors. So that's, you're absolutely right, you know, the perception of U.S. investors versus U.S. economy explains why the U.S. stock market has struggled so far this year.
Yeah. And if you go up north in Canada, the story is totally
different. Our stock market is at a new high right now.
Despite
the fact that we have a 7% unemployment rate now and which is a
massive difference with the U.S. at 4.2%. The stock market in Canada
is at new highs. And Denis, I think that's a reflection that everybody
understands that we are challenged cyclically right now with the
uncertainty on tariffs. But at the same time, what we understand also
is, since the federal election, the Prime Minister, well the throne
speech was actually read by King Charles. But there's a commitment
from the federal government to focus on the Canadian economy on the
scale that we haven't seen in many, many years. So, people are saying,
well, if I don't really like U.S. assets, I don't understand. I
clearly understand that the federal government in Canada wants to be
pro-growth. And that's, you know, there's, you know, there's this wind
of optimism that is blowing north of the border.
And for this time around, it's not just oil and gas that's doing well, it's a bit widespread in the economy.
Yeah, so when we saw the stock market doing very well in 2000, it was mostly the energy sector. But, with this commitment of the federal government to reindustrialize the nation, that means, you know, more corporate lending, attracting capital, we're open for business. Then obviously, under these circumstances, you can understand that, you know, the financials of the Canadian banks are at a new all-time high. Having said that, it's still not a one trick pony with only the banks. We have industrials doing well, materials, consumer discretionary. People believe that there will be new structural policies deployed in Canada to close the valuation gap that we've endured with the U.S. for over a decade. So again, Denis, this is a structural change. Understand, we are cyclically challenged. Let's be careful in the months ahead. But structurally, there's something different happening in Canada. That's how powerful this can be when policymakers decide to become pro-growth.
Yeah, and the consequences of that, Canadian dollar is going higher because now you have probably Canadian investors, but foreign investors buying in Canada.
Well Denis, that's the flip side. I think if people are interested in your assets, the currency will do well. So, the Canadian dollar's appreciating about the most in four years. So, we were concerned earlier this year about Canadian dollar depreciation. But with the throne speech that we saw, the commitment to be pro-growth for the Canadian economy, these are words until now, but maybe the actions will speak for themselves in the next few quarters, but this is very powerful and it's driving a stronger Canadian dollar. So, might be a source of frustration for exporters, but clearly there's demand and that's an improvement in our terms of trade right now.
And you know, on the same path, Mr. Carney says that I want to invest more money in defense and, and that's kind of good military expenses because you have to build the economy around that. But it's not only building tanks, and it's helping the whole economy.
So, the commitment is to grow the economy, but at the same time to be an active participant within NATO because right now we have the lowest military expenditure in the G7, which means that we are struggling as a nation. Now, the commitment to increase our military complex is very, very important. So, to me, that speaks volumes to the government's commitment to do so. But if you do so, and with a Buy Canada Act, all of a sudden, I have more leeways to improve our industrial structure.
And the next slide will show that we need to invest in our economy. You know, you've been saying that for months and years now. And when you compare ourselves, there's a lot to do.
Oh, Denis, you know, on manufacturing, we've been atrophying our manufacturing so much that, you know, now for the first time ever, our manufacturing sector is smaller than Ireland, which is a population of 5,000,000. So, we need to do a lot better there. And I think that I can be hopeful that with this new procurement system, we can actually kick start manufacturing, and that means reindustrializing our nation.
And you've been discussing that in the past. You know, there's so much regulation in Canada. But once again, the next slide, you know, speak by themself, we need to do something.
It's a big slide, but all you need to know, Denis, is that the federal government is responsible for 320,000 regulations, in manufacturing alone at 110,000. So, it doesn't cost much for the federal government to show the example and say, in order to deploy private capital in Canada, I'll make it easier. I will slash the regulatory requirements that we have, which are one of, some of the most punitive in the industrialized world.
And that's excluding provincials and municipalities.
No provinces, no municipalities on that. So, but if the federal government shows the example, all of a sudden, Canada becomes more investable. So, to me, that's a structural change that would be extremely conducive to this growth and evaluations, the discount that we've been dealing with for the past decade can go away. This is, you know, structurally speaking, as I said, I mean, these are probably the most, the best news we've had from Ottawa. If we can tackle regulations as well as the other commitment that you have, I can only be more optimistic for our country going forward.
Well, Stéfane, this is a change from the past few months and not only few years about Canada, but it's the first time we were seeing your optimism about Canada. And it seems that also, you know, the investors and the foreign investors are, then more to come I believe.
The next challenge Denis is the upcoming G7 meeting. If Mr. Trump, if Mr. Carney can show that he gets along with Mr. Trump and then it looks like we can commit to a trade agreement in the next few quarters, I think people will become even more interested in Canada. So, you know, the words have been put out there. Now we need to see the actions and if there's a commitment to come up with these actions and after G7 meetings, all of these things could make us even more positive for Canada so hopefully when we see each other later this summer, we'll have better news for the Canadian economy. But things look up right now despite the fact that we are cyclically challenged, there's good news, structurally speaking.
Well, thank you very much, Stéfane. Thank you all for listening to us and we'll see you in a few weeks. Thank you.
Hello everyone. Welcome to Economic Impact. Today is May 2nd, 2025 and as usual, I am with our Chief Economist, Stéfane Marion. Hello, Stéfane.
Hello, Denis. It's been only two weeks since we saw each other, but it's been volatile in markets and actually, outside the U.S., people remain pretty confident. So every asset class, pretty much every asset class is up year to date now. It's a big change from early April, except one.
Except one.
Except one, which one?
South of the border.
It's U.S. equities, are still down 8% year to date. Still the uncertainty about the global economy, and particularly what the White House wants to do with this whole tariff structure.
And talking about tariffs, where are they now because they move quite a lot. The last time we were around 32% and now I think we're a little bit down, but not as much as probably we would hope.
I can tell you that, in my entire career, I've never seen tariffs move like that or moves like that. We went from 2 to 5 to 10 to 7 to 36 to 24. Now we stand at 23% as of today. So down from 26%, which was where we were just two weeks ago, but still overly punitive for the U.S. economy. So, I think that this needs to be settled. Everybody thinks it will come down, but how soon will they come down will dictate the U.S. economic performance and the performance of U.S. profits.
Yeah, because those tariffs are still pretty high, now we're starting to talk more about stagflation. And the ISM showed that inflation expected is high, but productivity is down too at the same time, which is not good.
Yeah, many corporations don't even provide guidance right now because they don't know what the tariff structure will be just in the next few weeks. So, what you see in the U.S., GDP was negative in Q1 for the first time in over three years. In manufacturing, production is down, which echoes what we saw on GDP. But notice Denis, the red line, prices are up. That could squeeze your profit margins. You're selling less and your input prices are rising. So, will you be able to sustain your earnings guidance under these circumstances? People don't know. Corporations don't know, they're dropping earnings guidance. And unlike the pandemic episode, if you want, the government is not sending cheques to households to allow prices to be fully reflected on the CPI. So, this means uncertainty about profit margins and profit growth and obviously the performance of the S&P 500.
Yeah, today we had the employment numbers in the United States.
Quite stable, despite everything we saw the past few weeks.
And
the White House was complacent and they're saying that this is the
proof that tariffs are not hurting the U.S. economy. I think we have
to be careful with that assessment Denis because historically,
corporations don't layoff people as soon as production comes down.
They wait a few months to say, is it improving or not? So, what we're
seeing in the U.S. is, yes, the unemployment rate has been stable
since the second half of last year, but will it be the same in the
next few months? I would venture to say that, if production does not
pick up, and I'm not so sure it will pick up, the unemployment rate is
likely to go up in the second half of this year. Now, from the Federal
Reserve perspective, can you really cut interest rates if inflation is
still rising? That's a big unknown. The market is very aggressive
right now, pricing in four rate cuts for the Federal Reserve. But if
it's a stagflationary component to U.S. economic growth they won't be
able to cut rates as aggressively, and that could fragilize the stock
market. So, this is very important. In the next few months, will the
U.S. see rising unemployment rates? And that will be the critical
element that will allow the president to be a lot less aggressive on tariffs.
Yeah, but he was happy this morning for sure.
Yes, but that means he can remain aggressive on tariffs, so I want him to be less aggressive.
Which is bad for that number.
So, exactly. So, the unemployment rate will be critical in the next few months.
If we come back in Canada. In Canada, you know, we had also the GDP number. GDP number is positive, you know, compared to the U.S., which was negative, but it has a bad trend right now.
So, yes. So, we're not going to be down on growth in Q1. So that's great news when you consider that. However, so we have positive growth, lackluster growth, you know, maybe 1.5%. But notice Denis that population is going at 2.8%. And this is the issue from a Canadian perspective: the blue line is supposed to grow faster than the red line, not the other way around. So, this is a critical development that needs to be addressed by our politician. We just had an election in Canada. We have a new Prime Minister that said that, you know the economy is a priority for him, so we need to fix this. Absolutely. This is not normal. We need to put policies in place that will foster an environment where the blue line grows faster than the red line.
And then, you know, talking about that, we need to talk about investment because at some point, you know, we still have that lag between the U.S. and Canada in terms of business investment, and that has to change.
So we need.
Mr. Carney has to tackle that one.
So basically, what you're telling me, we need to improve productivity and we can't just grow on population growth. And that means we need to bring business investment. I think you're right on that one. You're absolutely right on that one. And we haven't had, you know, business investment that has been stable or stagnant for the past decade. And that's unprecedented in Canadian history. So, the U.S., you know, business investment is more than doubled over in the U.S. over that period. So, this is the critical element. This needs to be, this has to be a priority for Mr. Carney. So he won't be staying home very long. So, this is a priority.
He's going to the White House next week.
You're right. So that's number one. So, in order to grow business investment, you need to attract or retain investment in this country or attract foreign direct investment in Canada. So, I need visibility on my access to the U.S. market. So that's point number one. You're absolutely right. The other one that we spoke too often is domestically, we need to abolish these interprovincial trade barriers in order to foster East-West production or trade.
Yeah, and we have to react on that because we keep talking about it, but we haven't seen anything yet that is coming and saying we drop that. We drop that. No, it's just words right now. And election.
You're right. And with the currency that continues to appreciate. So basically the Canadian dollar is appreciated more than tariffs have increased on Canada. So it doesn't really help our businesses. So not only do we not know if we have market access to U.S., the currency is appreciating, which is not necessarily great for earnings. So, this needs to be settled, and if the currency appreciates, why don't we show a little bit more, let's be a little bit more pragmatic. Let's reduce the regulatory environment because, you know, the Prime Minister says we need to spend more to invest more in the country, but it won't help if you have this very prohibitive regulatory environment that needs to be tackled. And, corporate income taxes as well as energy policies is a big unknown. So, these are all priorities that need to be addressed. Unfortunately, you don't have much time. So that needs to be addressed over the next three to six months.
Yeah. And we know that corporations will probably go South of the border because of everything going on right now. They want to produce product there to get access to that big market. Then having those foreigners coming to Canada, we're going to be, or we're going to need to be very, very attractive. Then he mentioned it, fiscality, you know, regulation, we need to do that fast. And you said it, Mr. Carney, will have a big agenda in the coming weeks if we want to see that curve moving up for the first time since a long period of time.
You're right that you can't coast just business investment. You know, the private sector just with government spending. It's more than that. It's the overall environment, the business environment. Are you business-friendly? Are you open for business or only so? So, yes, the priority is, as you said, renegotiate USMCA and tackle all the regulatory environment that reduces business investment in this country. And who knows Denis, if you do all this, I'm optimistic that they would reduce the valuation gap between the S&P TSX and the S&P 500. I think there's hope to be optimistic provided that the Prime Minister acts swiftly on all of these fronts.
So what do we do as investors? You know, we've been very prudent. We ask people to be very prudent, rightly so. Now we're seeing in some assets are doing better except the U.S., but we know that never good to short U.S. because that economy is very resilient.
You're absolutely right. However, I would say that there's probably a, you know, investors are probably looking at, is it normal to deploy so much capital in the U.S. if I have alternatives elsewhere? So, I think Europe is starting to provide an alternative. I want Canada to provide an alternative. So, from a relative performance standpoint, I still think that the U.S. is likely to underperform unless Mr. Trump backs down very aggressively on tariffs. So, but having said this, Denis, we have yet to see this happen. So, for that reason, still prudent in terms of our asset mix at this point in time.
Good. Thank you, Stéfane. Thank you to all of you to listening to us. And above all, don't miss our next meeting next June. Thank you.
Welcome everyone, today, April 15th, 2025 Economic impact videos. We've been reaching out to you for the past five years. Today's a special day, marks our five-year anniversary. We started these in April of 2020, just at the beginning of the pandemic and today we're in the middle of a tariff war. It's important. We are a financial institution. We reach out close to 8000 of our clients on a monthly basis. We have a responsibility. We need to share our opinions, our views on the economy. Today are unprecedented times. We are facing an American administration that is trying to change the world, which brings all sorts of challenges and concerns over the world. So, these are a way for us to reach out to you to tell you what we're seeing, our opinions. So, we're going to keep doing these. But today's a special day, five-year anniversary. And I'm going to pass the mic to Denis Girouard, who's been doing this for the past couple of years, and our Chief Economist, Stéfane Marion.
Thank you, Laurent. So Stéfane, where are we on those tariffs now?
And by the way, I need to thank Laurent too, you know, remind us that we're five years older after all of this. It's action-packed Denis, just like it was five years ago for different reasons. So, tariff structure on its way up, way up, way, way, way up. So.
They keep moving though.
They move all the time. It moves all the time. So, we went from 2 to 5 to 10 to 36 to 32. Now we're at 26 as of April 15th. If you want me to give you some historical perspective on this, you have to go back to 1901 to see 26% effective tariffs on U.S. imports.
Well, with those tariffs, there's an impact on an inflation expectation.
Oh the U.S. consumer is so much bigger than it was in 1901. So therefore 2/3 of the economy, tariff structure 26%, while consumers are concerned, and it clearly shows in the numbers, inflation expectations. It doesn't mean it will be realized, Denis, but consumers are potentially fearing the worst inflation since the 1980's, 6.7%.
Yeah. And because of that, the consumer sentiment is way, way low.
There's one thing you can do to really make consumers feel mad is it's inflation. We've seen it during the pandemic, right? Case and point. We have consumer sentiment right now as low as it was during the pandemic. Again, this inflation thing really is annoying to consumers. So that does not necessarily bode well for the US economy in the months ahead.
Consumers are not happy, but also the equity market.
Well, yeah, if you're, if you're going to hit 2/3 of U.S. economy, you're going to hit financial markets, and U.S. equities are being hit big time. The S&P 500 went as low as 19%, so we did not enter a bear market territory, which would mean reaching- Pardon me?
-20%?
Yeah -20%. So we went to -19%, we're at -12%.
Technically, we're not there.
We're not there, but we're still, you know, in correction territory in a sense. We're still below -10%. Denis, surprisingly, people have been asking, you know, how's the Canadian stock market going to behave? We had lower valuation to start off with. So, we've been hit less hard than other places. And right now we're down 8%. So, some relative resilience if you want. Everyone's down, but some countries are down less than others.
Yeah. At the same time, the U.S. dollar also is getting hammered.
Well, that's part of the reason that Canadian sector is more resilient. People are buying into Canadian assets. We can speak to that in the next few minutes, but clearly the U.S. dollar is not very popular right now. It's not popular within central banks. It's not popular with foreign, foreign pension funds. So, there's been a shunning of the U.S. dollar. And this is very unusual. Historically, when the stock market goes down, U.S. dollar should be going up, not down. This is really a change in correlation that reflects the uncertainty created by the tariff war.
Yeah, we have the stock market being quite volatile, but also the bond market, but also the spread on the corporate credit. It's widening quite a lot in that period of time.
Yeah. So, people are shunning the U.S. dollar. They're not very happy about U.S. treasuries. But one thing they don't like right now is the corporate debt market, which is very important to, as a source of liquidity, for U.S. corporations. So right now, corporate spreads 148 basis points. Right now it's way up 150 basis points up since the start of the year. Denis that's a big deal because if you're a high-yield corporation right now, your financing costs, your effective yield. If you're going to issue bonds, you got to pay 8%.
That's a lot. OK, there's a lot of people talking about stagflation. Are we going in a recession right now?
Slow down? Definitely. So much so that we have brought back to life our Recession Risk Monthly Monitor, which is available on the website for people interested. I'll spare you the details of all of these numbers. Suffice is to say, there's a lot of yellow in here, some red. If you put it all together, odds of a recession right now is 40%. Not the baseline scenario, but clearly there are some concerns that, in the months ahead, if you don't reduce tariffs, while I think these probabilities are likely to increase. So let's be careful right now. Financial markets rebound, equity rebounds, a lot of volatility, but these odds are likely to continue to rise unless Washington decides to lower tariffs. Not the case right now on a substantial level.
And there's maybe a pleasant surprise and all those news, Canadian dollar, which is bizarrely up.
So historically, if I get these probabilities to rise, you don't want to own the Canadian dollar. But, a lot of things are different this time around and Canadian dollar is actually behaving quite well, 5%. Our model says you should be 5 to 10% cheaper than what we are right now. But there seems to be some interest in the Canadian dollar or Canadian dollar assets.
Yeah. And what's really the effective rate, you know, on those tariffs in Canada? Because, you know, we have that that agreement between Mexico, United States and us, which is supposed to be at 20 something percent. And but we're all mixed up here, OK, because it's tough to follow and understand where we are.
So, there's a lot of confusion. So people are buying Canadian dollar assets because foreign investors believe that we're less impacted. Well, less impacted negatively versus other countries. So let me illustrate this and, and the confusion to try to help with the confusion. If we had no free trade agreements with the Americans, given what they have in place, we would be facing an effective tariff rate of 24%. But we do have a free trade agreement called USMCA and a lot of Canadian corporations are USMCA compliant. All the energy producers are now USMCA compliant. Put it all together right now Denis, so the effective tariff rate on Canada is 5.7%. The confusion out there is to say, well, everyone is a minimum 10%. No, not the case. If you are USMCA compliant, particularly if you're an energy producer, 5.7%. Now if more firms become, Canadian corporations become USMCA compliant, between now and the year end, we could be at 4.2% or even lower if Washington reduces tariffs on aluminum software lumber. So right now, 5.7%, you can understand that foreign players or foreign investors saying, well, I'm going to invest in the place where the tariff structure is less punitive. We are part of that group.
Then don't show that to President Trump because he wants everybody at 10%.
I think he's aware of that because he's calling the exception that he knows that if taxing Canadian energy would just make inflation expectations worse in U.S., so that's why we are where we are.
And we showed that Canadian dollars earlier that is going up, but not only the Canadian dollar is going up, but also the reserve for the Central bank are going up in Canadian dollar.
I think the central banks are partly to blame. You've got that right, Denis. And people forget that we are the 5th largest foreign currency held by central banks. We're at 3% of the total right now. We started from nothing in 2012. We're at 3%. There's more people, foreign banks or you know, investing in Canadian dollar than in, you know, in the Chinese renminbi or the Swiss franc or the Australian dollar. So at 3%. Now you might say 3% is still small Stéfane, but the dollar amount is huge to need $450 billion. It's never happened in Canadian history that central banks own such a large part of Canadian assets or the bond market if you want. So that keeps a bid on the Canadian dollar, it explains why we are stronger than we would otherwise be. But that reflects the tremendous uncertainty facing the global economy in this punitive tariff structure that could undermine the U.S. economy in the months ahead. So.
So Stéfane, you've been telling us for many months that we need to be prudent. What do we do now?
At 26%, you're still prudent. And these tariffs got to go down. They need to go down to 10%. Seriously, Denis. So, let's be careful out there. I can't justify a stock market valuation or U.S. equities that are trading at, you know, 18 times forward earnings. I think the surprise will come from a significant deterioration in corporate earnings in the months ahead. Financing costs are up. You're selling less to the rest of the world. Clearly, that's not good for profits. So again, it will be volatile again for the next few months. So, let's be prudent out there.
Thank you, Laurent. Thank you, Stéfane. Thank you to all of you for following us for all those years. Hopefully, it's going to last many months or many years. Until then, we'll see you beginning of May. Thank you.
With the help of our experts, we demystify various myths about investing.