This is our first video of the year and again happy to report that we did 21.3% last year and thus far this year we are up well over 3% now so I'm very very happy with what the portfolio is doing. I have got to admit right now what is going on in the world is just incredible with the Trump victory. He has moved since January 2nd so quickly to implement his policies and the truth be told nobody really knows what his policies are. Initially he started with tariffs against Canada and Mexico and in a very short time he was able to get Canada and Mexico to acques to his demands of better border patrol cracking down on fentel etc so he's really flexing his muscles and showing that he is going to use the weight of the American government the American economy to change things. Now tariffs appear to be Trump's attack plan or weapon of choice and normally tariffs are thought of as very bad things as it creates incredible costs and incredible hardships on consumers so specifically I think what Trump is trying to do is to rebuild the US economy, move away from globalism, more to a meral approach where America he says is no longer going to be the dumping ground for consumer products but America is once again going to start manufacturing things. So, this is a massive change in what is going on now. Whether Trump persists on the tariffs or not remains to be seen so it's very hard to draw conclusions immediately, but I think he will continue to use them as leverage. The problem again with tariffs is if he brings tariffs into the US the costs for us consumers go up considerably and it's very damaging to other countries, Canada included. I have to admit I feel a bit sorry for our politicians who have been caught blindsided by this and don't really know what to do because we've never seen this before. Ultimately I think Trump is trying to as I mentioned strengthen the US economy's industrial base again and with the revenue he takes in from tariffs it's quite possible he may want to do a tax cut for US citizens which would in essence be a good thing but he's going to have a really tough time with the deficit. Now he's brought in Musk and others to try to cut cost tremendously in government programs but as we sit, the US economy and the global economy are still not in good shape. Currently both gold and silver are up sharply this year and in short what we are seeing is a global reset. Trump has effectively said that he is repatriating US gold back to the US and we’ve seen this through recently a delivery report of I think 400 to 450 tons of gold that need to be delivered from London back to the US. What we’ve seen is a problem with delivery as there’s not enough gold for the huge demand that has come through the comx where these contracts, instead of settling up in cash, are demanding the physical gold. So, this is just a continuation of what we've seen where the world in the globalist structure is no longer going to be the case in all countries and now including the US are bringing their gold home because effectively gold has always been used for international transactions. I heard a very good quote from Vince Lany (a gold trader) who I listen to his podcast daily said that for two generations the government and the media have been very good at taking gold out of the equation where a lot of people don't really understand what gold is or what its historical practices or what the historical relevance was and as we go forward I believe the US and all countries are repatriating their gold so that they can use it going forward. I think this trend is going to continue now. This is a reset much like 1934 where FDR confiscated gold and revalued it so that the US dollar dropped 40% against gold or Nixon going off the gold backing. With this massive amount of gold being repatriated to the US it is resetting the stage going forward so as this takes place I think what governments and central banks are looking to do around the world is to increase the amount of gold they have on the balance sheet, reduce their US treasury bills and treasury bonds which is a problem for the US treasury as they have to issue I believe anywhere from 7 to 9 trillion dollars of bonds this year. So what I think they're trying to do is repatriate the gold not go back to the gold standard but one thing what we have seen is Judy Shelton wrote a book recently and Trump nominated her in his first term for Secretary of the federal reserve and she did not pass the approval process. But she wrote a book where she's recommending that the US issue gold back bonds again not necessarily going back to a gold standard but using gold in the process of finance.
Our Insights
Our Insights
Our Insights
The Filipiuk Group's commentary
A financial reset in progress
In this weeks video we discuss the impact of Trump's tariff policies and why the recent trend in the gold market is indicating that there's a financial reset in progress.
Gold's resurgence in the banking system
In this video we discuss the reasons behind the current bull market in gold. Including gold's history in the banking system and its new elevation as a reserve asset as well as the new BRICS Nation's unit with gold.
Gold's elevation to a tier one asset in the banking system is a massive change that will have significant implications going forward. Gold will now be used in the global banking system in ways we haven’t seen in our lifetime and will become a more relevant asset in the investment world. To understand how big of a change this we are must look back at when it was removed from the banking system originally and why it has come back. Now the current global US dollar-based system was created in 1944 at the Breton Woods conference in New Hampshire. Gold was pegged at $35 an ounce to the US dollar and other countries could peg their currency value to the US dollar as well. This agreement was a huge benefit to the US but had its challenges and weaknesses. The system in its original form began to break down in the 1960s resulting from a massive increase in US dollars globally. The US in effect had created too many dollars when compared to the gold that they needed to back it. Other countries had begun to demand gold for their US dollars because those dollars were not worth what the peg stated. By 1971 the US stopped pegging the dollar to gold at $35 an ounce because countries demanded gold for their dollars and had depleted the US gold reserves ending this arrangement. It essentially let the price of gold float freely in the open market. Gold had been illegal for US citizens to hold since 1934 but in 1975 the US reversed this law, and it was once again legal for US citizens to own gold. January 1st, 1975 was the first day of this change and it was expected that there would be massive demand for gold as a result, but this didn’t happen because at the same time the bank of international settlements conveniently devalued gold's collateral value on bank balance sheets. This move effectively made it much more costly for banks to hold gold and as a result banks in the western financial system sold their gold in massive quantities. This selling value completely crushed the expected increase in gold buying by US citizens. This policy devaluation of gold's value in the banking system helped to drive the price of gold down by almost 50% over the next year and a half, temporarily crushing the bull market in gold however continuing inflation. Problems in the US persisted throughout the mid-1970s and this brought back buyers into gold investor. Demand for gold eventually took the price to a new high of $850 in 1980 but the impact of gold’s demonetization by the banking system would be obvious to market watchers. Massive money printing over the next several decades would drive a stock bond and real estate bull market in which gold as an investment became an afterthought. Gold had been effectively removed from the banking system in 1975 and wasn't needed by investors anymore fast forward to 2019 and gold has once again been brought back into the global banking system. The BIS’s Basal 3 agreement raised gold status from a tier 3 asset to a tier 1 asset. This rule change would effectively remonetize what was originally done back in 1975. This move would now make gold just as valuable as other tier one reserve assets such as US dollars and US treasuries within the banking system. This move means that now central banks and governments, the biggest players in the world, will want to buy gold more than at any time in the last 50 years. This policy change was done with very little fanfare and virtually no business media coverage. Subsequent to this change we have seen massive central bank buying most recently in 2022 and 2023. This central bank buying has helped drive gold to a new current all-time high of $2,800 an ounce. This buying is very likely to continue another factor that is important to consider is that currently the BRICs nations are in the process of creating their own settlement currency or unit using gold. The gold waiting in this unit ensures that gold will be backing payments when settling trade imbalances between these BRICs nations. This new arrangement will increase gold's usage going forward and should help drive the current gold price much higher in years to come. Western nation’s central and commercial banks will be scrambling to accumulate more gold. For this new reality with the revaluation of gold and its possible new use in international trade settlement it is likely that we will see a large change in the relative value between gold and hard assets versus financial assets like stocks bonds and real estate. Gold will rise and financial assets will drop in relation to one another with the ever-increasing global conflicts around the world gold's value and usage internationally will rise as well. Given the changes we've discussed this is why we believe that gold will become an important asset in investment portfolios going forward in order for investors to preserve their net worth and properly hedge the financial assets they own they must have a portion of their portfolio in gold.
BRICS nations meeting this past week
In this week's video we discuss the important takeaways from the BRICS Nation's meeting that finished last week and a quick note on a summary of our long write up from a few weeks ago.
The BRICs meeting in Russia has now concluded and as expected there were some interesting developments that were brought forward in this meeting. As I've stated before the Breton Woods Agreement that’s been in place since the 1940s with the US dollar as the dominant world reserve currency is slowly whittling away. Now one of the things that triggered this was the US action in removing Russia from the Swiss system. Basically, the US froze Russian assets, swift trading system, and as a result took the Russians off the swift trading system which is basically the system that the whole globe uses. Now having seen these other nations that are afraid of falling on the wrong side of the US said maybe we should help the Russians develop an alternate trading system so that we don’t get frozen out from the trading because of US sanctions. So, the BRICs have really moved quickly in developing an alternative trading system to the US dollar. Now this is a very important development that I can't emphasize enough that's going to influence and affect investors globally. In short the Breton Woods Agreement allowed the US to have commodities globally priced in US dollars and now this was a huge benefit because the US could print lots of money run deficits which they've done since the early 60s and the excess money that they were printing and running these deficits could be absorbed globally meaning countries outside of the US always needed US dollars to buy commodities. Countries were happy to keep US dollars on reserve but also buy US treasuries. Now this is changing because countries have as we've seen with the Ukraine war don't want to have a lot of US dollar assets and treasuries if they run a file of the US. So, this meeting in Russia was very significant to the BRICs settlement system. One of the things that was proposed that Vladimir Putin has said they'd like to produce a BRICs precious metal exchange and commodity exchange so that commodities will trade in their nations under their control as opposed to the west. Right now, commodities have been largely priced in New York City and London although Shanghai has recently developed in the past two decades. By pricing their own commodities the BRICs nations feel they'll get a much better price for their commodities and hence that will benefit their economy so the BRICs developing a different trading system using 40% gold is a big event and as I've mentioned there's been very little coverage here in North America on this so I did a write up last week showing the history of the US dollar dominance and how it's changing. We've also produced a short bullet point highlighting the import important points from my article. I encourage you to look at that and if you have time to read my article again because it's going to have a big impact on investment returns going forward. It's a long-term progression but as it stands now one of the reasons why gold and silver may have run up so much this year is the markets are preparing for what is developing in this BRICs settlement system. So what I think this means for investors specifically in the US and Canada is that over the next decade or two we're going to see a rise in hard assets like gold and commodities, oil etc and a decline in financial assets meaning stocks, real estate and bonds because with a different, alternative trading and currency system, it's going to be harder to create leverage in this world and let's face it leverage has been a massive driving factor between behind the asset gains in stocks and really state over the last 40 or 50 years. So please have a look at my article and the bullet points as I think this is a very large issue and a big turning point in how the world does business going forward.
The implications of the Federal Reserve's first rate cut
In this week's video we discuss the Federal Reserve’s decision to lower interest rates 50 bps, the beginning of a global rate cutting cycle, and what investors can expect in stocks and precious metals.
Yesterday the US federal reserve cut interest rates 50 basis points taking the fed funds rate down from 5 and a half to 5% and this is a very significant event because it means now that the globe is in a loosening cycle the federal reserve has cut rates half a percentage point. This basically allows other central banks around the world to start cutting interest rates and continue to do so as the global economy appears to be slowing. Specifically in the US the federal reserve cut rates believing that the economy now needs help and as a result we’re likely to see many more rate cuts to come over the next one to two years. Now if we look at the bond market the US federal reserve controls short-term interest rates meaning the overnight lending rate between banks is controlled by the federal reserve. However, the bond market is set by traders, investors etc., who every day, buy and sell bonds and determine what the interest rate is for any specific period. So, the fed only controls the short term, the markets control the longer term however the two-year bond is a very important indicator. Jeff Gunak at Double Line Capital who's one of the largest bond fund or fixed income managers in the world always states how important it is to look at the 2-year bond. Now the 2-year bond currently as of yesterday was at 3.6%. The fed funds rate was at 5.5%. This is a difference of 90 basis points and I read an article the other day where the author indicated this is one of the largest discrepancies or differences between the fed funds rate and the two-year bond rate 190 basis points and what it says is effectively that the federal reserve is behind the curve meaning the fed now has to catch up to what the bond market has been saying. So, the two-year bond has rallied dramatically taking yields down to 3.6% and in order for the fed to get a normalized yield curve and a normalized yield curve is when short-term rates are lower than longer term rates. The fed has to cut at least two full perent percentage points to normalize the curve so it looks like we're in for as I mentioned a lot of interest rate cuts going forward and what this means is that effectively central banks around the world are cutting interest rates to devalue their currency in order to stimulate loan growth to reflate economies but the one problem now is that inflation that's been coming down isn't necessarily under control or finished with. So the fact that the central banks are making money cheaper at a time where inflation is still effectively in the system raises some real problems so what this effectively means for investors going forward for stocks it's quite likely stocks may rally initially on the euphoria of interest rate cuts however the reason interest rate cuts are occurring as I mentioned is because the economy is weakening and with a weakening economy it's quite likely we will see earnings numbers for the US economy and for stocks coming down. So, the stock mark market could be vulnerable over the next 3 to 6 months for precious metals and commodities it's quite bullish. As I mentioned the currencies of the world are going to be devalued by lower interest rates and as a result hard asset could do very well. So, for investors going forward it's important to remember we have just started an interest rate cycle lowering the cost of money and as a result we will see I think very volatile markets and a lot of uncertainty going forward. I do expect the precious metals to continue to rally on the continued inflation fears and the geopolitical problems that are occurring right now in the world.
Want to watch more from The Filipiuk Group? We have an extensive library of videos waiting for you on a broad range of financial topics.
National Bank Financial Ranked #1 for Advised Investor Satisfaction by J.D. Power 2 years in a row
Economic news
Economic Impact
To keep you informed and stimulate your thinking, Stéfane Marion and Denis Girouard take a look at economic news and share their perspectives in our monthly informative videos.
Hello everyone. Welcome to Economic Impact. Today is May 2nd, 2025 and as usual, I am with our Chief Economist, Stéfane Marion. Hello, Stéfane.
Hello, Denis. It's been only two weeks since we saw each other, but it's been volatile in markets and actually, outside the U.S., people remain pretty confident. So every asset class, pretty much every asset class is up year to date now. It's a big change from early April, except one.
Except one.
Except one, which one?
South of the border.
It's U.S. equities, are still down 8% year to date. Still the uncertainty about the global economy, and particularly what the White House wants to do with this whole tariff structure.
And talking about tariffs, where are they now because they move quite a lot. The last time we were around 32% and now I think we're a little bit down, but not as much as probably we would hope.
I can tell you that, in my entire career, I've never seen tariffs move like that or moves like that. We went from 2 to 5 to 10 to 7 to 36 to 24. Now we stand at 23% as of today. So down from 26%, which was where we were just two weeks ago, but still overly punitive for the U.S. economy. So, I think that this needs to be settled. Everybody thinks it will come down, but how soon will they come down will dictate the U.S. economic performance and the performance of U.S. profits.
Yeah, because those tariffs are still pretty high, now we're starting to talk more about stagflation. And the ISM showed that inflation expected is high, but productivity is down too at the same time, which is not good.
Yeah, many corporations don't even provide guidance right now because they don't know what the tariff structure will be just in the next few weeks. So, what you see in the U.S., GDP was negative in Q1 for the first time in over three years. In manufacturing, production is down, which echoes what we saw on GDP. But notice Denis, the red line, prices are up. That could squeeze your profit margins. You're selling less and your input prices are rising. So, will you be able to sustain your earnings guidance under these circumstances? People don't know. Corporations don't know, they're dropping earnings guidance. And unlike the pandemic episode, if you want, the government is not sending cheques to households to allow prices to be fully reflected on the CPI. So, this means uncertainty about profit margins and profit growth and obviously the performance of the S&P 500.
Yeah, today we had the employment numbers in the United States.
Quite stable, despite everything we saw the past few weeks.
And
the White House was complacent and they're saying that this is the
proof that tariffs are not hurting the U.S. economy. I think we have
to be careful with that assessment Denis because historically,
corporations don't layoff people as soon as production comes down.
They wait a few months to say, is it improving or not? So, what we're
seeing in the U.S. is, yes, the unemployment rate has been stable
since the second half of last year, but will it be the same in the
next few months? I would venture to say that, if production does not
pick up, and I'm not so sure it will pick up, the unemployment rate is
likely to go up in the second half of this year. Now, from the Federal
Reserve perspective, can you really cut interest rates if inflation is
still rising? That's a big unknown. The market is very aggressive
right now, pricing in four rate cuts for the Federal Reserve. But if
it's a stagflationary component to U.S. economic growth they won't be
able to cut rates as aggressively, and that could fragilize the stock
market. So, this is very important. In the next few months, will the
U.S. see rising unemployment rates? And that will be the critical
element that will allow the president to be a lot less aggressive on tariffs.
Yeah, but he was happy this morning for sure.
Yes, but that means he can remain aggressive on tariffs, so I want him to be less aggressive.
Which is bad for that number.
So, exactly. So, the unemployment rate will be critical in the next few months.
If we come back in Canada. In Canada, you know, we had also the GDP number. GDP number is positive, you know, compared to the U.S., which was negative, but it has a bad trend right now.
So, yes. So, we're not going to be down on growth in Q1. So that's great news when you consider that. However, so we have positive growth, lackluster growth, you know, maybe 1.5%. But notice Denis that population is going at 2.8%. And this is the issue from a Canadian perspective: the blue line is supposed to grow faster than the red line, not the other way around. So, this is a critical development that needs to be addressed by our politician. We just had an election in Canada. We have a new Prime Minister that said that, you know the economy is a priority for him, so we need to fix this. Absolutely. This is not normal. We need to put policies in place that will foster an environment where the blue line grows faster than the red line.
And then, you know, talking about that, we need to talk about investment because at some point, you know, we still have that lag between the U.S. and Canada in terms of business investment, and that has to change.
So we need.
Mr. Carney has to tackle that one.
So basically, what you're telling me, we need to improve productivity and we can't just grow on population growth. And that means we need to bring business investment. I think you're right on that one. You're absolutely right on that one. And we haven't had, you know, business investment that has been stable or stagnant for the past decade. And that's unprecedented in Canadian history. So, the U.S., you know, business investment is more than doubled over in the U.S. over that period. So, this is the critical element. This needs to be, this has to be a priority for Mr. Carney. So he won't be staying home very long. So, this is a priority.
He's going to the White House next week.
You're right. So that's number one. So, in order to grow business investment, you need to attract or retain investment in this country or attract foreign direct investment in Canada. So, I need visibility on my access to the U.S. market. So that's point number one. You're absolutely right. The other one that we spoke too often is domestically, we need to abolish these interprovincial trade barriers in order to foster East-West production or trade.
Yeah, and we have to react on that because we keep talking about it, but we haven't seen anything yet that is coming and saying we drop that. We drop that. No, it's just words right now. And election.
You're right. And with the currency that continues to appreciate. So basically the Canadian dollar is appreciated more than tariffs have increased on Canada. So it doesn't really help our businesses. So not only do we not know if we have market access to U.S., the currency is appreciating, which is not necessarily great for earnings. So, this needs to be settled, and if the currency appreciates, why don't we show a little bit more, let's be a little bit more pragmatic. Let's reduce the regulatory environment because, you know, the Prime Minister says we need to spend more to invest more in the country, but it won't help if you have this very prohibitive regulatory environment that needs to be tackled. And, corporate income taxes as well as energy policies is a big unknown. So, these are all priorities that need to be addressed. Unfortunately, you don't have much time. So that needs to be addressed over the next three to six months.
Yeah. And we know that corporations will probably go South of the border because of everything going on right now. They want to produce product there to get access to that big market. Then having those foreigners coming to Canada, we're going to be, or we're going to need to be very, very attractive. Then he mentioned it, fiscality, you know, regulation, we need to do that fast. And you said it, Mr. Carney, will have a big agenda in the coming weeks if we want to see that curve moving up for the first time since a long period of time.
You're right that you can't coast just business investment. You know, the private sector just with government spending. It's more than that. It's the overall environment, the business environment. Are you business-friendly? Are you open for business or only so? So, yes, the priority is, as you said, renegotiate USMCA and tackle all the regulatory environment that reduces business investment in this country. And who knows Denis, if you do all this, I'm optimistic that they would reduce the valuation gap between the S&P TSX and the S&P 500. I think there's hope to be optimistic provided that the Prime Minister acts swiftly on all of these fronts.
So what do we do as investors? You know, we've been very prudent. We ask people to be very prudent, rightly so. Now we're seeing in some assets are doing better except the U.S., but we know that never good to short U.S. because that economy is very resilient.
You're absolutely right. However, I would say that there's probably a, you know, investors are probably looking at, is it normal to deploy so much capital in the U.S. if I have alternatives elsewhere? So, I think Europe is starting to provide an alternative. I want Canada to provide an alternative. So, from a relative performance standpoint, I still think that the U.S. is likely to underperform unless Mr. Trump backs down very aggressively on tariffs. So, but having said this, Denis, we have yet to see this happen. So, for that reason, still prudent in terms of our asset mix at this point in time.
Good. Thank you, Stéfane. Thank you to all of you to listening to us. And above all, don't miss our next meeting next June. Thank you.
Property Perspective
Our National Bank specialists decode the latest trends in the real estate market, including interest rates, the resale market and forecasts for the coming months.
Hello everyone and welcome to this November 28th edition of Property Perspective. Today I have the pleasure to be with Matthieu Arseneau, hello Matthieu.
Hi Simon.
And with Andrée Desrosiers.
Hello Simon.
Hello Andrée. Our topic of the day, what's best for my mortgage, a fixed or a variable rate. But before we enter that interesting discussion with Andrée, let's talk with Matthieu about recent economic news that influence the real estate market. So Matthieu, a number of events have occurred since we last spoke, all of which have an impact on the economic outlook, obviously. First, what are the implication of the Republican sweep in the US presidential election for economic growth and interest rates?
Yes, this was a big event and there will be application for that for Canada over the next four years. Higher uncertainty, we saw that with the announcement of potential tariff on Canada. We'll see. But clearly, in my mind, the big event and this has implication for the housing market in Canada, particularly for interest rates. It's the fact that there could be much more fiscal stimulus South of the border given the promises of Trump during the campaign. As you can see on that chart, while the Congressional Budget Office was expecting roughly 6% of GDP deficit, which is already very high, it could be as high as 8% if all those promises are realized by Mr. Trump. So at the moment the Federal Reserve is trying to calm inflation in the US, calm the economy. There's government that could support growth over the next few years. So before the election, the Federal Reserve started to decline rates. They did already 75 basis points. But you can see that at the same time it didn't mean that longer term rates decline. In fact, it increased because of risk of tariffs and its implication for inflation because of stronger growth, though that's something we have to keep in mind. And the problem with that increase is given a global correlation in interest rates, when you have the largest economy in the world supporting the economy and having those rates it has an impact on rates in countries with economies not as strong as the US and has to cope with those increases. And that could be difficult for a couple of other economies in the world given the increase of those of those rates. So big implication and that has implications for Canada as well.
Very interesting Matthieu, so the ability to lower the prime rate in the US now looks more limited. What about Canada?
In Canada, so we saw that in fact for investors expectation for the policy rate in the US, it was expected at 3%. Now it's much more closer to 4% by the end of next year. So clearly investors revised their optimism for rate cuts in the US. In Canada, the situation is clearly different in our view when you look at the labour market here, I'm showing the jobless wait for the prime age workers, the 25-54, it has continued to increase over the past few months. And that's diverging with the US and it's now its highest since 2017. And we don't see stabilization over the next few months given the hiring intention of corporations. So for us that's a sign that the economy has cooled significantly and this is reflected in inflation. When you look at services, core services excluding shelter in the US, it's running at 4.4% because they didn't have that weakness that we got in Canada, it's so it's running at 1.3%. So clearly inflation is under control here. So yes, we expect the Bank of Canada to continue to decline rates. Prior to recent announcements, we were expecting policy rate as low as 2% by the end of next year. But given the transfer that was also announced by the federal government, it could lead to upwardly revise a bit. We'll see if it will be implemented. But clearly as you can see on that chart, while Bank of Canada is declining rates, 10 year rate is increasing and is essentially in its last two years average at this point. So not that much relief for long term rates. So that's something to keep in mind. But for that reason, perhaps it's another reason for the Canada to try to push down those rates by having short term rates very low. So that's our expectation at this time, OK.
Matthieu, the government has announced recently an additional break on population growth for the next three years. What are the implications of this new announcement on the real estate market?
We talked about it very often over the past few months. Housing shortage is still very acute in Canada. We see that in the rental market with rent still increasing at a tepid pace. Same thing for first time home buyers. It's where affordability is still a problem. So I think it's the good decision to calm down population growth. In fact, with the recent announcement about the declining non permanent resident to 5% of population over a 2 year. Reducing permanent resident temporarily, that will lead for— when you look at the five year period, when we look in 2028, the pace for the next 5 years will be similar to what we had prior to the pandemic level, much more sustainable and much more in line with our capacity to welcome. So, I think it's a good decision at this point given housing shortage. And we have to keep in mind newcomers have problems to integrate the labour market in the current context. So let's fix that situation and get back to normal after this three-year period of slow growth and we will be able to get back to the model we had that was benefiting the Canadian economy prior to the pandemic.
So finally good news. Thank you, Matthieu for your very interesting comments. Let's now discuss with Andrée, hello Andrée. In the context of the anticipated drop of the interest rate by the end of this year and obviously in 2025, should we go with a fixed rate or variable rate for our mortgage?
Very good questions Simon and indeed very relevant. The choice between a fixed rate and a variable rate for a mortgage depends on several factors, especially in the context of falling rates. Our risk tolerance, financial situation and short and mid economic outlook are key, you know, considerations to look at. We must first understand the bearish rate context, however, When the Bank of Canada lowers its prime rate, financial institutions typically adjust, you know, their mortgage rates in response to that downsize. Variable rates will generally follow primary fluctuations and become particularly advantageous in the short term. Fixed rates, although often higher than variable rates at the time of subscription, offer protection against potential future increases. We must however remember that they usually follow the interest rate on long term bonds and not the Bank of Canada prime rate. Therefore, a quarter point drop in the prime rate does not mean that fixed rate will fall by the same amount.
OK. We must therefore understand this context carefully before making our decision. You're right, Andrée. Many people assume that when there's a drop in the prime rate, all rates fluctuate in the same way. However, as we have just seen, that isn't the case since different rates are influenced by different factors. With that in mind, Andrée, what are the advantages of one or the other?
Yeah. If we look first, you know, at the variable rate, you should consider that rate if you believe that interest rates will continue to decline or stay low for an extended period of time. You can also choose the variable rate if you're comfortable with some level of risk and can handle or afford, you know, potential payment increases if rates rise. Also if you want to benefit from lower penalties, if you decide to pay off your mortgage early or switch lenders. Also, some variable rates loans offer the option to switch to a fixed rate if rates increase. On the other hand, you should consider, you know, a fixed rate if you prefer stability and want to avoid uncertainty, if you think rates might rise in the midterm and again, if your budget cannot accommodate sudden increases in monthly payments.
So once again, Andrée, the choice does not automatically go towards one or the other. Even if we are in the context of falling rates. As you mentioned, we must make sure to take other elements into account in our decision. You are very right Simon. And we must also not forget that some lenders offer mixed rate mortgages, you know, part fixed, part variables. So this approach allows you to balance the advantages of both options and reducing risk while still benefiting partially from falling rates. So in summary, you know in a falling rate environment, a variable rate may seem more advantageous in the short term, but it remains a bet on future rate trends. If you're comfortable with some uncertainty, a variable rate could maximize your savings. However, if peace of mind is your priority, a fixed rate is the safer choice. It all depends like usual on your financial profile and financial goals. To help you in your choice as usual, do not hesitate to consider or consult a mortgage specialist to assess your personal situation and provide you the right advice for that choice.
Thank you Andrée for sharing your insights. As you suggested, having a discussion with a mortgage specialist will help make the right decision. There's no point about that. So thank you all for watching and join us again very soon for our next edition of Property Perspective.
5 • 4 • 3 Market Outlook
5 minutes, 4 graphs, 3 key takeaways! Discover a fresh focused quarterly review of markets, the economy and investments with expert Louis Lajoie from our CIO Office.
Hello everyone. Today, March 6, we're going to try to assess in just a few minutes a rather complex and constantly changing economic backdrop and what this could all mean for markets going forward.
And to start with, I think it's important to understand that according to some indicators, we are actually facing the highest degree of uncertainty from an economic standpoint, economic policy standpoint for at least the past 25 years. So, we shouldn't be surprised to see equity markets’ volatility pick up against such an uncertain backdrop as markets try to assess what is the ultimate outcome and setting in terms of tariffs policy coming from south of the border.
But as you can see here, the reaction is anything but exaggerated, so far, relatively muted, although we have seen indeed a pickup in volatility, maybe because markets have been conditioned not to overreact to uncertainty after a decade that has seen its fair share of historical events. But nonetheless, for the S&P 500 U.S. equity market, this marks a substantial shift in mood and sentiment compared to the optimism that prevailed following the last presidential election, the equity market now being slightly negative since the start of the year.
And everybody's trying to assess where this may be headed going forward. But one thing is clear. If you take a big step back and look back at the last few weeks and months, that is the importance of diversification, which holds true when you think in terms of trading between countries, but definitely true when they think in terms of portfolio management.
And case in point, if you actually take a globally diversified equity portfolio in Canadian dollars, as you can see here, indeed there's slight gains still here today, large part due to substantial rebound in equity markets in Europe. But most importantly here you see that the path has been much narrower, much less volatile given these diversification effects. One very important being the impact of the Canadian dollar by depreciating helps returns when you bring them back home. So, diversification is somewhat working within equities and also working across asset classes with bonds having a rather good start to the year in the face of concerns over global growth, such that if you look at a very plain vanilla 60%-40% balanced portfolio, again, you see quite a narrow path in terms of volatility and very little damage so far in 2025.
Now, I want to be clear here, we've got to be cautious because there's definitely downside potential when you look ahead. And to give specific numbers here, the Bank of Canada actually tried to assess what could be the impact on our economy in the broad, a very extreme global trade war scenario. And the takeaway here is it's not a scenario that looks like anything like the [2008] global financial crisis or the pandemic but nonetheless could halt essentially growth in Canada in 2025 and ultimately create some problems for inflation as well.
But if there's one thing clear here though from the last few months, it's that the U.S. economy is anything but immune from a tariff shock, again being self-inflicted here by its own government. And specifically, we've actually seen a bit like the stock market consumer sentiment, which initially picked up post-election, now reversing course and coming down over the past two weeks, which definitely reflects concerns over inflation in the face of uncertainty about tariffs, consumer inflation expectations and that very survey usually don't move all that much, but have recently reached their highest level in in 20 years. So, this is something that we must keep a close eye on over the coming months because again, the U.S. economy may not be very much export-led, but it's definitely consumer-led. So that is very important.
Three takeaways for today. Again, there is a tremendous amount of uncertainty, which for now, markets have been essentially holding their breath, waiting some clarity as to how this all going to be evolving and what will be the ultimate impact on the economy. Technically, there's definitely downside risk for growth, especially in a country like Canada, but there's also upside for inflation in the U.S. So, we'll have to see how this all plays out. And in terms of markets, this means that we are likely going to be facing substantial volatility as we have seen since the start of the year, but maybe even more so going forward as we see these effects in the economy. And as such, we think that the mindset that investors should have against such an uncertain backdrop is one focused on the diversification, which has worked again since the start of the year, much more than one, very much focused on any specific views one may have on a U.S. president that again here, is very unpredictable.
That's it for today. Thank you for listening and we will talk again in June.
Week at a Glance
The experts at National Bank Financial give a detailed analysis on how the stock markets and fixed income markets have performed every week.
Finance in focus
Invest in you Challenge
Watch these short
videos and discover practical tips and tools that can help you succeed
at every stage of your life as a woman.
Thought leadership
Dive into articles and
videos from our experts that redefine the trends of the industry
Savings and investments
Discover our
investment options that will help you realize your projects or prepare
for the unexpected
Economic analysis
Weekly Economic Watch
This publication keeps you posted on a wide range of economic and financial indicators affecting the local, North American and global markets. It includes brief commentaries on economic and financial news items.
Vision
Looking for reliable financial analysis? The Economics and Strategy Group provide a detailed report on interest rates, bonds, the stock market and portfolio strategy.
Monthly Economic Monitor
Explore a regional overview with our monthly monitors covering Canada, the United States and the world, each offering forecasts tailored to its area's economic outlook.
Monthly Equity Monitor
Experts from National Bank summarize the current state of stock markets globally in this monthly report.
Investment strategy
Investment Strategy
This quarterly publication informs you of global economic conditions, asset allocation recommendations and economic forecasts.
Asset Allocation Strategy
What’s moving in the financial market and how does that impact your investments? National Bank Investments provides a portfolio strategy across asset classes.
Federal and provincial budgets
Federal Budget
Learn how the Canadian Government plans to execute the annual economic agenda in this year's federal budget.
Ontario Budget
Our experts examine your province's budget and the financial updates related to it.
Guides and tools
Investing Guide
This reference guide contains a wealth of practical information and tools to help you plan your projects. Download it to your desktop to enjoy all the features.
Tax and Investment Guide
Find everything you will need to successfully file your taxes in our comprehensive tax and investment guide.
Myths and Realities
Looking for reliable financial analysis? The CIO Office of National Bank Investments provides a detailed report on interest rates, bonds, the stock market and portfolio strategy.
Quick Facts
Find the amounts of the different government plans (CPP, QPP, OAS), the TFSA, RRSP and RESP contribution limits, and the link to the different tax tables.
Fraud prevention
Find out how to protect yourself against fraud.
National Bank Financial received the highest score in the J.D. Power 2024 Canada Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study and in the advised segment of the J.D. Power 2025 Canada Investor Satisfaction Studies, which measures the satisfaction of investors who may engage with any financial advisor(s). For J.D. Power award information, visit jdpower.com/awards.
