Hello everyone, welcome to Economic Impact. Today we are November 12,
2025, and as usual, I am with our Chief Economist, Stéfane Marion.
Stéfane, once again we need to talk about, you know, Canada versus
U.S., but rate cuts now.
There are so many things we want to speak to you Denis today, but
let's start with the rate cuts because that's your specialty as a
former head of fixed income. So yes, monetary easing cycle continued
in Canada in October. 9th. It was the 9th easing rate cut since the
beginning of the cycle that started in the summer of 2024. You know,
we spoke last month, could there be more? The Bank of Canada was
cautious on this one, Denis. It says, "I'm giving you one, but I
think rates are neutral and I think I might be done for this easing
cycle". So there's a considerable gap that remains with the U.S.,
you know, to reflect some of the challenges that we face on this side
of the border. But it seems like the Bank of Canada is comfortable now
saying, "Well, maybe monetary policy is where it should be".
Do you think it's unusual thinking that the rates will not go lower,
considering what we see in the economy right now?
I would have thought so, like you, but the surprise in the Canadian
economy over the past month, the past two months, is the uncanny
resilience. So, the service sector in Canada, which is the biggest
chunk of the Canadian economy, is indicating growth for the first time
in nine months, right. And the manufacturing sector is still showing
contraction, but nowhere near as bad as what we saw, so it seems like
the Canadian economy is stabilizing with growth. It's not a boom
Denis, but it's better growth than we had forecasted. So, you could
justify the Bank of Canada's message based on the recent evidence that
we're getting from economic reports.
And this is also what we get from the unemployment number, which was
a big surprise.
All these surveys are meaningless if you can't confirm it with real
data. And the real data shows that we've had some job creation to the
extent that, good enough, to the extent that the unemployment rate
actually edged below 7% for the first time in a few months. And more
importantly, the wage inflation is growing at roughly 4%, which is
above inflation. So that means that there is purchasing power at the
consumer level that could help stabilize the Canadian economy, despite
the fact that the export sector remains challenged.
It's quite interesting seeing that because this is not the
perception we have when we're listening to the news. It's very
negative compared to the results here.
You're right. And if you look at the, you know, there's been
announcement that Ottawa's thinking about reducing quite significantly
the size of the civil service in Ottawa. But having said this, what's
happening in the private sector in Canada shows again, this
resilience. So, notice in the U.S., the trend on private sector
employment, this is a private survey Denis because, as you know, the
government is still shut down-reopening, but it's going to take time
to get the official data. But the private sector suggests this
downtrend in U.S. employment growth. Canada is more volatile. So, I
can't say that we have broken the trend with the U.S., but clearly in
the last month we did. So again, that just speaks to some resilience
in the private sector because the earnings season was better than
expected on the S&P/TSX, so that would be reflected on employment.
So, private sector holding up relatively well at this point in time.
Again, suggesting that the BoC, the Bank of Canada, might have been
justified to say, "Well, maybe we've done enough".
Now we have the reason. Ok. And now we have to talk about the budget
in Canada because we spoke about it the last time. Now it's done.
Yeah, so we spoke last month. Ok, so one of the reasons the Bank
Canada says, "Well, I need to pause now" is because, you
know, we are getting fiscal stimulus in Canada. Maybe the budget was
not as transformational as we thought it would be last month where we
were arguing for $100 billion deficit, 3% of GDP. It came in that $80
billion. So, Denis, close enough to say, is it a structuring budget? I
think it is because if you look at the composition of the spending for
the years ahead, look at these blue bars, this is investment. This is
not just spending that just goes to consumers and then that disappears
in the economy through some import leakages. Absolutely not. This is a
commitment to invest in the Canadian economy and to start to
reindustrialize the country. So, notice that on the operating balance,
you know, Ottawa says "Well, we'll be in surplus in three years
from now, but we are committing roughly $280 billion to investment in
the Canadian economy". So, Denis, that is structuring.
And this is how you build confidence in an economy when you see that
amount of investment, which are not expenses, which down the road will
produce revenue.
Yes, so, so you're going to run a 2.5% deficit as a share of GDP
this year. But the commitment to skew it towards investment means that
investors are unlikely to say, "Well, we don't believe in your
story". They're going to say, "Ok, finally". And it's
not just the spending Denis, it's also the commitment to reduce the
substantial amount of regulation in this country. And also,
importantly to say, maybe assets will be available for these pension
funds to buy into Canada. So, in terms of, you know, positioning this
budget, I would say it is structuring. So, we spoke about that last
month and that was important and I think that they went in the right
direction. Now there's a few things that need to be settled among
which, you know, trade negotiations with the U.S. need to resume
because that stopped since last time we saw each other. So. But again,
it's certainly a big step in the right direction.
And that new picture to see deficit probably translates also
positive on the stocks in the equity market because, we're not at a
new high, but we're doing quite well.
Well, the performance this year has been stellar. I mean, more than
20%. Last time we saw that was 1993. By the way, that's the last time
the Blue Jays won the World Series.
Well, we were close this year.
You were close.
Very close.
But we did more than 25% in 1993. So, we didn't win this year, but
maybe, you know, more than 20% is great. So, aside from the Blue Jays,
there's the fact that again, this budget is credible. And if you cut
regulations for corporation, that means that you will help
profitability down the road and that's more sustainable for the
Canadian economy. We need to bring investment back to Canada. It's
making Canada investable again. And I think on that side, the budget
was important for investors. So, a lot of good news already priced in
Denis. I can't promise you a repeat performance next year, but this
proves that, you know, the budget was relatively well received. Now
it's a matter of execution.
Yeah, exactly. And we see also that the Canadian dollar are fine,
kind of. We saw the bottom, but now I think it's above $0.70. It's
natural that the Canadian dollar is there.
No, you're right. And since the start of the year, we've seen, you
know, Canadian dollar depreciation. Our forecast is, well, we might go
to 1.42. You can see we went to 141.5, which is close enough to 142. I
think you'll agree with me. Now, have we found the cruising altitude?
A key condition to finding the cruising altitude for the Looney was
this budget. So, the budget is credible. Now, what we're missing is,
the budget was necessary, but not sufficient. Now we need to execute
on bringing the regulation but also restarting these trade discussions
with the Americans to provide, to have the full impact of the budget.
So again, not out of the woods, but I think we're starting to find a
cruising altitude. So, there might be more side for Canadian dollar
appreciation in the quarters ahead.
Well, thank you Stéfane and thank you all of you. Today is my last
presence on the stage. I would like to thank all the people, the
investors who are listening to us and the positive comment that we get
and we had. Very, very helpful to make that, you know, capsule better
and better every day hopefully. I would like to thank also all the
people here who make that thing happen. Spectacular team, all the
technicians and the people around these stages are fantastic. And
Stéphane, thank you very much for let me do that for you for the last
past two years or so. It was a lot of fun, a lot of pleasure and long
life to Economic Impact.
Denis if I may, I just have to thank you for the 35 years you spent
at the Bank. And I would just want to say it was a privilege to work
with you.
Thank you Stéfane.
Thank you very much.
Goodbye.